Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 27;22(2):1819–1835. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbaa035

Table 2.

Overall and subgenome assessment of homoeolog expression estimation

GSNAP-PolyCat HyLiTE EAGLE-RC RSEM Salmon Kallisto Bowtie2
Reference D 5 D 5 A 2 A 2 and D 5 Polyploid AD
Efficiency 87.7 ± 1.5% 82.2 ± 0.7% 81.5 ± 0.7% 96.3 ± 0.8% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 84.9 ± 1.5%
At 86.7 ± 1.6% 78.5 ± 1.0% 82.7 ± 0.7% 95.5 ± 0.9% 101.0 ± 0.6% 101.6 ± 0.5% 101.5 ± 0.6% 84.6 ± 1.5%
Dt 88.6 ± 1.6% 85.8 ± 0.6% 80.3 ± 0.9% 97.1 ± 1.0% 99.1 ± 0.6% 98.5 ± 0.5% 98.6 ± 0.6% 85.1 ± 1.6%
Discrepancy 12.7 ± 1.5% 18.1 ± 0.8% 18.7 ± 0.8% 5.1 ± 0.8% 5.1 ± 0.6% 5.1 ± 0.6% 5.1 ± 0.6% 15.9 ± 1.5%
At 13.4 ± 1.6% 21.0 ± 1.1% 17.5 ± 0.8% 5.4 ± 0.9% 5.4 ± 0.6% 5.2 ± 0.6% 5.2 ± 0.6% 16.0 ± 1.5%
Dt 12.1 ± 1.5% 14.8 ± 0.6% 20.0 ± 0.9% 4.8 ± 0.8% 4.8 ± 0.6% 5.1 ± 0.6% 5.0 ± 0.6% 15.7 ± 1.5%
Precision
At 98.4 ± 0.1% 92.4 ± 0.3% 91.9 ± 0.4% 98.1 ± 0.1% 95.1 ± 0.2% 94.3 ± 0.2% 94.4 ± 0.2% 95.5 ± 0.1%
Dt 97.7 ± 0.5% 91.2 ± 0.6% 91.6 ± 0.5% 97.2 ± 0.5% 97.0 ± 0.5% 96.5 ± 0.4% 96.4 ± 0.4% 96.1 ± 0.5%
Recall
At 97.7 ± 0.5% 90.6 ± 0.6% 93.1 ± 0.4% 97.2 ± 0.4% 96.5 ± 0.5% 96.4 ± 0.4% 96.4 ± 0.4% 96.4 ± 0.5%
Dt 98.1 ± 0.1% 94.0 ± 0.3% 91.3 ± 0.4% 97.9 ± 0.1% 96.2 ± 0.2% 95.4 ± 0.2% 95.4 ± 0.2% 95.0 ± 0.1%
F 1 score
At 98.7 ± 0.2% 92.2 ± 0.4% 92.9 ± 0.3% 98.1 ± 0.2% 97.2 ± 0.3% 96.8 ± 0.2% 96.9 ± 0.2% 97.0 ± 0.3%
Dt 98.7 ± 0.2% 93.1 ± 0.4% 92.1 ± 0.3% 98.0 ± 0.2% 97.2 ± 0.3% 96.7 ± 0.2% 96.7 ± 0.2% 96.9 ± 0.3%
Accuracy* 98.2 ± 0.2% 93.7 ± 0.7% 93.6 ± 0.3% 97.7 ± 0.2% 96.3 ± 0.3% 95.7 ± 0.2% 95.8 ± 0.2% 96.2 ± 0.2%
MCC* 96.8 ± 0.5% 84.5 ± 0.7% 84.2 ± 0.7% 95.8 ± 0.4% 95.5 ± 0.5% 94.7 ± 0.4% 94.8 ± 0.4% 94.2 ± 0.5%

Note: The best performance for each metric is marked in bold text.

*Same values for At and Dt reads.