Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 22;11(3):e042227. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042227

Table 4.

Multivariate logistic analysis of the association of vitamin D status with socioeconomic status index and health service utilisation variables

Vitamin D status Insufficiency
aOR (95% CI)*
Deficiency
aOR (95% CI)*
Severe deficiency
aOR (95% CI)*
Socioeconomic status
SES index
 High 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Middle 1.26 (0.80 to 1.99) 1.23 (0.82 to 1.82) 1.70 (1.02 to 2.84)
 Low 2.40 (1.52 to 3.80) 1.64 (1.08 to 2.50) 2.45 (1.45 to 4.14)
Utilisation of health services
Accept eugenic publicity
 No 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Yes 0.94 (0.64 to 1.40) 0.77 (0.54 to 1.11) 1.10 (0.70 to 1.72)
Physical examination during the past year
 No 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Yes 0.74 (0.50 to 1.09) 0.49 (0.35 to 0.70) 0.24 (0.15 to 0.39)

*Adjusted for women’s age, gravidity, BMI, history of chronic diseases, nutritional supplement, meat intake, egg intake, fish intake, vegetable and fruit intake, beans or bean product intake, milk or dairy product intake, picky eating habits, passive smoking and physical exercise.

aOR, adjusted OR; BMI, body mass index; SES, socioeconomic status.