Table 1.
Non-challenged | Troubled | Resilient | Vulnerable | F value | Partial eta sq | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M (SD) | M (SD) | M (SD) | M (SD) | |||
Parity | 1.98 (.89) | 2.30 (.88) | 2.03 (.91) | 2.08 (.88) | .89 | .02 |
Mother Age | 31.9 (4.5) | 32.4 (4.3) | 30.8 (4.6) | 30.5 (3.9) | 1.8 | .03 |
Mother Education | 3.68 (1.4) | 3.03 (1.2) | 3.31 (1.4) | 3.35 (1.3) | 1.6 | .03 |
Father Age | 33.5 (6.1) | 34.3 (7.1) | 32.8 (6.0) | 33.3 (5.7) | .80 | .01 |
Father Education | 3.70 (1.5) | 3.73 (1.6) | 2.94 (1.4) | 2.98 (1.5) | 3.9** | .06 |
Household Income | 60,595.24 (24,243.49) | 55,576.92 (20,546.38) | 53,611.11 (25,318.48) | 50,416.67 (23,166.52) | 1.6 | .03 |
Note. The responses for education variables were as follows: 1 = no degree, 2 = High school diploma/GED, 3 = Associate degree, 4 = Vocational degree, 5 = Bachelor’s degree, 6 = Master’s degree, 7 = PhD., MD, etc.
p < .01.
Although there was an overall group difference in fathers’ education, none of the groups were significantly different from each other, although the difference between non-challenged vs. resilient groups approached significance (p = .052).