Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 23.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2020 Feb 17;22(3):7. doi: 10.1007/s11908-020-0715-4

Table 1.

Strengths and Weakness of C. difficile Tests [3, 7]

Test Strengths Weaknesses Sensitivity Specificity Positive Predictive Value Negative Predictive Value
Cell culture cytotoxicity neutralization assay Detects presence of toxin Poor sensitivity
Prolonged turnaround time
65–90% 96–100% 50–87% 97–99%
Toxigenic Culture Commonly considered the gold standard in method comparison Detects toxin gene
Prolonged turnaround time
80–100% 93–97% 57–91% 87–97%
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay Detects presence of toxin
Low cost
Fast turnaround time
Variable sensitivity 40–100% 84–100% 50–100% 78–99%
Glutamate Dehydrogenase Detects presence of antigen Produced by both toxigenic and nontoxigenic strains 87–100% 76–98% 71–91% 97–100%
Nucleic acid amplification test Detects presence of gene Concern for overdiagnosis and detection of C. difficile colonization 83–100% 87–98% 46–94% 96–100%