Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 23.
Published in final edited form as: Genet Epidemiol. 2020 Mar 1;44(5):442–468. doi: 10.1002/gepi.22288

TABLE 2.

Summary of conditional analysis at known breast cancer risk region

Before conditional analysis
After conditional analysis
Gene Number of SNPs Number of significant SNPs Index GWAS SNP p value Number of significant SNPs Index SNP Smallest conditional p values Ratioa Magnitude of change in the minimum p value before and after COJO
ALS2CR12 480 12 8.2E–17 1 rs3769823 6.40E–09 0.92 1.28E–08
ATG10 619 24 6.9E–13 0 rs891159 1.20E–07 1.00 5.75E–06
ATP6AP1L 581 24 6.9E–13 0 rs891159 1.70E–07 1.00 4.06E–06
CASP8 493 12 8.2E–17 6 rs3769823 3.90E–12 0.50 2.10E–05
CRHR1 229 13 1.5E–10 0 rs17763086 1.40E–05 1.00 1.07E–05
CRHR1-IT1 230 13 1.5E–10 0 rs17763086 9.90E–05 1.00 1.52E–06
HIST2H2BA 202 19 3.5E–52 1 rs11249433 7.40E–24 0.95 4.73E–29
KANSL1-AS1 34 13 1.5E–10 0 rs17763086 1.60E–01 1.00 9.38E–10
L3MBTL3 724 13 1.7E–12 0 rs6569648 1.40E–03 1.00 1.21E–09
LRRC37A 285 13 1.5E–10 0 rs17763086 4.60E–05 1.00 3.26E–06
LRRC37A4P 285 13 1.5E–10 0 rs17763086 4.60E–05 1.00 3.26E–06
MRPL23-AS1 557 36 2.4E–33 18 rs569550 1.20E–29 0.50 2.00E–04
NUDT17 112 17 1.5E–10 0 rs36107432 3.90E–05 1.00 3.85E–06
RP11-15A1.7 594 32 1E–16 0 rs10426528 4.60E–07 1.00 2.17E–10
RP11-250B2.5 503 8 2.7E–09 0 rs9343989 1.00E–03 1.00 2.70E–06
RP11-554A11.9 532 36 2.8E–44 33 rs680618 2.80E–44 0.08 1.00E+00
RP11-73O6.3 665 13 1.7E–12 0 rs6569648 1.70E–03 1.00 1.00E–09
STXBP4 687 46 2E–28 0 rs244353 2.10E–04 1.00 9.52E–25
ZNF155 597 32 1E–16 5 rs10426528 2.00E–09 0.84 5.00E–08
ZNF404 551 32 1E–16 0 rs10426528 5.30E–07 1.00 1.89E–10
LRRC37A2 152 2 2E–08 0 rs199498 1.80E–02 1.00 1.11E–06

Abbreviations: COJO, conditional and joint; GWAS, genome-wide association studies; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphisms.

a

Proportion of marginally significant SNPs that are not significant in conditional analyses. Analysis was performed using GWAS summary statistics of ER+ subtypes. The difference between marginal SNP tests for association (GWAS p values) and the SNP p values conditional on significant TWAS genes provides some evidence regarding the independence of the TWAS and single-SNP association signals. The number and proportion of SNPs that are genome-wide significant before and after conditioning on a TWAS-significant gene summarizes the degree single-SNP associations are dependent on (or independent of) the TWAS association.