Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 16;2021:8866311. doi: 10.1155/2021/8866311

Table 3.

Mechanisms of resveratrol antibacterial activity.

Organisms Mechanism descriptions Concentration (μg/mL) References
Biofilm
Fusobacterium nucleatum Gene expression was downregulated in the biofilm 1.5625–25 [124]
Escherichia coli Reduce expression of curli genes (csgA and csgB) 50–100 [103, 130]
Propionibacterium acnes Reduction in biofilm production [131]
Vibrio cholerae Reduction in biofilm production 10–30 [110]
Staphylococcus aureus No reduction in biofilm formation 20–100 [132]
Staphylococcus aureus Repressed the α-hemolysin hla gene and the intercellular adhesion locus (icaA and icaD) 100 [98, 133]
Arcobacter butzleri and Campylobacter spp. Reduction in biofilm production 12.5–50 [114]
Listeria monocytogenes Reduction in biofilm production 50–100 [134]

Motility
Escherichia coli Reduction in swarming 20 [26]
Proteus mirabilis Reduction in swarming 15–60 [135]
Vibrio vulnificus Reduction in swarming 30 μM [136]

Quorum sensing (QS)
Yersinia enterocolitica Reduction in QS 10–20 [137, 138]
Burkholderia spp. Reduction in QS 25 μM [139]

Toxins
Proteus mirabilis Inhibited and blocked swarming through an RsbA-dependent pathway 30–60 [135]
Staphylococcus aureus Reduced haemolysis 20 [92, 133]
Staphylococcus aureus Reduced haemolysis 10–100 [92, 133]
Vibrio vulnificus Reduced toxin expression 10–30 μM [136]
Vibrio cholerae Suppressed toxin activity 300–400 μM [140]

Adhesion
Vibrio vulnificus Reduced adhesion to host cells 10–30 μM [136]

Colonisation
Helicobacter pylori Decreased urease activity 6.25–400 [117]