Table 1.
Association between IIEF and CAD without and with adjusting other variables.
| Variables | CAD+ (n = 100) | CAD− (n = 100) | P value | Adjusted OR | 95% CI for OR | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||||||
| Age | 62.08 ± 2.85 | 60.08 ± 5.17 | 0.001 | 1.128 | 1.028 | 1.237 | 0.011 |
| TG | 158.4 ± 46.13 | 151.02 ± 52.0 | 0.289 | 0.997 | 0.990 | 1.004 | 0.433 |
| LDL | 152.07 ± 45.8 | 113.56 ± 42.03 | <0.001 | 1.012 | 1.004 | 1.020 | 0.002 |
| HDL | 39.9 ± 3.96 | 44.08 ± 5.15 | <0.001 | 0.862 | 0.796 | 0.933 | <0.001 |
| IIEF | 28.81 ± 18.32 | 45.58 ± 15.88 | <0.001 | 0.958 | 0.938 | 0.978 | <0.001 |
CAD, coronary artery disease; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; TG, triglycerides; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein. Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Analyses were performed using the t test and multiple unconditional logistic regression for unadjusting and adjusting covariates. There is a relation between ED and CAD by controlling the other covariates.