Table 2.
Age estimates and ancestral state reconstructions for key nodes.
| SN | Major clades and numbered nodes | Age estimates (Ma) |
Ancestral area reconstructions |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 95% HPD | BBM (Prob.) | DEC-Lagrange (Prob.) | ||
| 1 | Node 4, Stem node of the genus Incarvillea | 29.42 | 23.34–35.78 | NA | NA |
| 2 | Node 5, subgenera Niedzwedzkia–Incarvillea–Pteroscleris clade | 18.38 | 13.08–24.06 | F (76.6%) B (13.3%) |
B|F (25%) |
| 3 | Node 6, subgenera Olgaea–Amphicome clade | 16.99 | 9.87–23.85 | F (83%) D (7.28%) |
D|F (28.5%) |
| 4 | Node 7, subgenera Incarvillea–Pteroscleris clade | 15.29 | 9.94–21.2 | B (83.5%) AB (4.6%) |
B|B (54%) |
| 5 | Node 8, subgen. Pteroscleris clade | 7.65 | 3.56–12.85 | BC (53%) B (43%) |
B|B (37.1%) |
| 6 | Tribe Tecomeae clade | 33.43 | 27.06–39.17 | NA | NA |
BMM, Bayesian binary Markov chain Monte Carlo; HPD, highest posterior density; DEC, Dispersal–Extinction–Cladogenesis; Prob., relative probability.