Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 10;8:635831. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.635831

Table 3.

Randomized controlled trials evaluating clinical impact of rapid blood culture antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods.

Study, year, location Study design Rapid (intervention) method SOC (control) method Rapid test performance Outcomes of rapid test compared with standard methods Rapid testing paired with antimicrobial stewardship Comment
Doern, 1994, USA (74) Single-center prospective 2-arm RCT (N = 573) Baxter MicroScan WalkAway-96 reported same day Baxter MicroScan WalkAway-96 reported following day Time to AST result 16 h faster than SOC Decreased mortality, ancillary tests, cost
Change in antibiotic therapy was 15 h faster in rapid AST arm
No difference in LOS
No Randomization scheme based on first letter of patient last name
Beuving, 2015, Netherlands (75) Single-center prospective 2-arm RCT (N = 250) Growth in presence of antibiotics assessed by 16S rRNA PCR BD Phoenix 94% agreement with SOC AST
Time to AST result 15 h faster than SOC
Decreased TOT
No differences in mortality, LOS
No Rapid AST was not implemented optimally and results were not used by clinicians
Underpowered to detect differences in clinical outcomes
Banerjee, 2015, USA (20) Single-center, prospective 3-arm RCT (N = 617) BioFire BCID and BCID plus stewardship MALD-TOF, agar dilution 97% agreement for on-panel organisms
19% of isolated organisms not on rapid test panel
Time to AST result 49 h faster than SOC
Decreased TOT
Faster time to escalation and de-escalation, less treatment of contaminants, less broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment
No differences in mortality, LOS, adverse events, cost
Yes
Audit and feedback by ID pharmacist or physician 24/7 in one intervention arm; treatment guidance comments included in microbiology result report for both intervention arms
More impact among Gram-positive than Gram-negative infections
Population had low resistance rates
Underpowered to detect differences in clinical outcomes
Kim, 2020, Korea (76) Single-center, prospective 2-arm RCT of patients with hematologic malignancies (N = 89) QMAC-dRAST (QuantaMatrix, Inc.) MALDI-TOF, MicroScan, VITEK 2 Agreement with SOC not reported.
Time to AST result 35 h faster than SOC
Decreased TOT
Less broad-spectrum antibiotic use
No differences in mortality, Clostridium difficile, multidrug-resistant infections
Yes
ID team reviewed all patients
Excluded patients in both arms with off-panel organisms
Banerjee, 2020, USA (19) Multi-center prospective 2-arm RCT of patients with Gram-negative bacteremia (N = 448) Accelerate Pheno System MALDI-TOF, broth microdilution or agar dilution Time to AST 36 h faster than SOC Decreased TOT
No differences in mortality, LOS, adverse events, cost
Yes
Audit and feedback by ID pharmacist or physician Mon–Friday during the day
Greater impact for more resistant isolates
Population had low resistance rates
Underpowered to detect differences in clinical outcomes

PCR, polymerase chain reaction; SOC, standard of care; MALDI-TOF, matrix-assisted laser desorption–ionization time of flight; TOT, time to optimal therapy; LOS, length of stay; AST, antibiotic susceptibility testing; ID, infectious diseases; BCID, Blood Culture Identification.