Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Glaucoma. 2021 Mar 1;30(3):e61–e67. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001745

Table 2.

Results of univariate analysis evaluating the effect of each predictive variable on visual field mean deviation (MD) measurement at baseline and MD change over time (slope) in primary angle closure glaucoma eyes

Effect on Baseline MD Effect on MD Slope
Coefficient ± SE P Coefficient ± SE P
Age 0.10 ± 0.13 0.45 −0.02 ± 0.01 0.04
Gender (Male as ref) 2.94 ± 2.47 0.23 0.25 ± 0.18 0.16
Hypertension 3.23 ± 2.47 0.19 −0.44 ± 0.17 0.01
Diabetes Mellitus −0.42 ± 2.49 0.87 −0.44 ± 0.16 0.01
Central corneal thickness −0.01 ± 0.03 0.84 <0.001 ± 0.002 0.98
Mean IOP during follow-up 0.48 ± 0.36 0.19 −0.01 ± 0.03 0.86
IOP SD during follow-up −0.82 ± 0.83 0.32 −0.09 ± 0.06 0.18
Number of anti-glaucoma medications −1.15 ± 0.95 0.22 −0.23 ± 0.07 0.001
Follow-up duration 0.79 ± 0.54 0.14 −0.05 ± 0.04 0.15
Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness 0.40 ± 0.05 <0.001 0.01 ± 0.01 0.14
Ganglion cell complex thickness 0.31 ± 0.06 <0.001 0.01 ± 0.01 0.06
wiVD disc 0.76 ± 0.06 <0.001 0.03 ± 0.01 0.02
wiVD macula 1.04 ± 0.20 <0.001 0.05 ± 0.02 0.02
Presence of MvD −9.96 ± 1.60 <0.001 −0.21 ± 0.18 0.26

SE: standard error; IOP: intraocular pressure; SD: standard deviation; wiVD: whole image vessel density; MvD: Parapapillary deep-layer microvascular dropout. Optical coherence tomography examinations were performed at the last VF examination visit.