Table 2.

Unadjusted and Adjusted Negative Binomial Regressions of IPV, by Sex (n=720)

	Bivariate associations		Model 1: IPV experience among women (n=396)		Model 2: IPV perpetration by men (n=324)
Variable	IRR (95% CI)	p-value	aIRR (95% CI)	p-value	aIRR (95% CI)	p-value
Food insecurity	1.06 (1.02, 1.09)	<0.001	1.06 (1.01, 1.10)	0.012	1.04 (1.01, 1.07)	0.043
Sociodemographics
Age (years)	0.99 (0.98, 1.01)	0.521	0.99 (0.97, 1.01)	0.350	0.99 (0.98, 1.02)	0.616
Children	1.01 (0.67, 1.04)	0.615	0.99 (0.93, 1.05)	0.340	1.01 (0.95, 1.06)	0.819
Primary school education	0.87 (0.75, 1.02)	0.095	0.78 (0.61, 1.04)	0.097	1.17 (0.98, 1.63)	0.171
Wealth index quintiles	0.95 (0.86, 1.05)	0.306	0.91 (0.83, 1.04)	0.537	1.02 (0.92, 1.07)	0.632
Widowed, separated, or single	0.99 (0.80, 1.19)	0.834	0.98 (0.68–1.45)	0.891	0.80 (0.43, 1.47)	0.475
Polygynous household	1.18 (0.97, 1.44)	0.079	1.41 (1.15, 1.72)	0.001	0.99 (0.60, 1.39)	0.946
Baseline CD4	1.00 (1.00, 1.00)	0.188	1.00 (1.00, 1.00)	0.589	1.00 (1.00, 1.00)	0.594
Interview Season (lean vs not)	1.24 (0.90, 1.72)	0.184	0.08 (0.59, 1.24)	0.412	1.34 (0.96, 1.86)	0.085

Note: Boldface indicates statistical significance (p<0.05).

IRR, incident risk ratio; aIRR, adjusted incident risk ratio; IPV, intimate partner violence.