Table 2.

Descriptive information of defocus curve.

Author, year	Trifocal IOLs	The Hybrid Multifocal-EDOF IOL	Results of defocus curve
Hamid and Sokwala, 201611	FineVision AT LISA tri 839MP	Symfony	Trifocal IOL worse than Symfony at -1D and -1.5D
Monaco, 201722	PanOptix	Symfony	Trifocal IOL better than Symfony at -1.5 D and from -4D to -2.5D
Ruiz-Mesa, 201724	FineVision	Symfony	Trifocal IOL better than Symfony from -4D to -2.5D
Cochener, 20187	PanOptix FineVision	Symfony	Trifocal IOL had slight humps at the principal foci, Symfony had smoother curve in the shape of a dome
Escandón-García, 201819	PanOptix FineVision	Symfony	Trifocal IOL better than Symfony at -2.5D and -3D, trifocal IOL worse than Symfony at -1D
Ruiz-Mesa, 201825	PanOptix	Symfony	Trifocal IOL better than Symfony from -4D to -2D
Böhm, 201913	PanOptix AT LISA tri 839MP	Symfony	Trifocal IOL better than Symfony at -2.5D, AT LISA tri 839MP worse than Symfony from -2D to -1D, PanOptix worse than Symfony at -1D
de Medeiros, 20194	PanOptix	Symfony	Trifocal IOL better than Symfony from -5D to -2D, trifocal IOL worse than Symfony from -1D to 0D
Gil, 202020	AT LISA tri 839MP	Symfony	Trifocal IOL better than Symfony from -4.5D to -2D, trifocal IOL worse than Symfony from -1.5D to 0D
Webers, 202027	AT LISA tri 839MP	Symfony	Trifocal IOL better than Symfony from -4D to -2.5D

EDOF, extended depth of focus; IOL, intraocular lens.