Table 3.

Descriptive information of contrast sensitivity.

Author, year	Trifocal IOLs	The Hybrid Multifocal-EDOF IOL	Results of contrast sensitivity
Hamid and Sokwala, 201611	FineVision AT LISA tri 839MP	Symfony	Significantly better in Symfony IOL in both photopic and scotopic conditions
Monaco, 201722	PanOptix	Symfony	No statistically significant differences in both photopic and scotopic conditions
Ruiz-Mesa, 201724	FineVision	Symfony	No statistically significant differences and both below the normal range at 12 cpd and 18 cpd in photopic and scotopic conditions
Ruiz-Mesa, 201825	PanOptix	Symfony	No statistically significant differences and both below the normal range at 12 cpd and 18 cpd in photopic and scotopic conditions
Cochener, 20187	PanOptix FineVision	Symfony	No statistically significant differences in both photopic and scotopic conditions
Mencucci, 201821	PanOptix AT LISA tri 839MP	Symfony	Significantly better in Symfony IOL in both photopic and scotopic conditions
Escandón-García, 201819	PanOptix FineVision	Symfony	Significantly better in Symfony IOL at 1.5 cpd in scotopic conditions
Singh, 201928	FineVision	Symfony	No statistically significant differences in both photopic and scotopic conditions
Webers, 202027	AT LISA tri 839MP	Symfony	No statistically significant differences in both photopic and scotopic conditions

EDOF, extended depth of focus; IOL, intraocular lens; cpd, cycles per degree.