Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 22;31(6):1221–1233.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.005

Table 2.

Statistics for Figure 2

Panel and dependent variable Omnibus test Effect of group (closed/control or open) Effect of session Interaction group × session Post hoc tests across groups (correcteda)
C one-way ANOVA N/A F(1, 509) = 6.0, p = 0.015 N/A N/A
Correlations
O1-O2 versus O2-C1
D one-way ANOVA N/A F(3, 1017) = 30.4, p < 0.001 N/A 1v2: p = 0.003 1v3: p < 0.001 1v4: p < 0.001 2v3: p = 0.030 2v4: p < 0.001 3v4: p = 0.020
Correlations over sessions/time
E two-way ANOVA F(1, 1238) = 1.6, p = 0.212 F(2, 1238) = 1.7, p = 0.190 F(2, 1238) = 0.9, p = 0.400 N/A
Doorway correlations
F one-way ANOVA N/A F(2, 598) = 11.0, p < 0.001 N/A O1vsO2 versus O2vsC1: p = 0.004 O1vsO2 versus C1vsC2: p < 0.001 All other p > 0.30
Fuhs rate remapping metric
I one-way ANOVA N/A F(1, 509) = 6.0, p = 0.015 N/A N/A
Correlations
O1-O2 versus O2-C1
J one-way ANOVA N/A F(3, 602) = 13.8, p < 0.001 N/A 1v2: p = 0.022 1v3: p < 0.001 1v4: p < 0.001 2v4: p = 0.005 All other p > 0.25
Correlations over sessions/time
K two-way ANOVA F(1, 774) = 1.2, p = 0.274 F(2, 774) = 4.2, p = 0.015 F(2, 774) = 0.2, p = 0.849 N/A
Doorway correlations
L one-way ANOVA N/A F(2, 330) = 0.2, p = 0.78 N/A N/A
Fuhs rate remapping metric
a

Note: all post hoc tests were based on estimated marginal means and corrected using the Tukey-Kramer method.