Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 24.
Published in final edited form as: Schizophr Res. 2012 Feb 4;136(1-3):70–81. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.12.018

Table 3.

Results from the post-hoc analysis of the significant group-by-task interaction. For each task MNI coordinates, cluster size, t-value, laterality and region are given (threshold: t=3.14, p<.05 HET corr.).

Contrast MNI coordinates Cluster size F-value L/R Region
X Y Z
Emotion recognition—controls > patients
2 −8 8 4440 6.04 R Thalamus
40 −22 −20 314 4.51 R Fusiform gyrus
52 30 8 159 4.41 R
−36 32 8 70 4.01 L Inferior frontal gyrus
−4 −74 52 191 4.39 L
8 −46 74 270 4.37 R Precuneus
4 −30 44 196 4.31 R Middle cingulate cortex
0 −50 −12 140 4.11 M Cerebellum
8 42 8 340 3.87 R Anterior cingulate cortex
−44 −82 20 63 3.86 L Middle temporal gyrus
Emotion recognition—patients > controls
Emotional perspective taking - controls > patients
14 6 −4 519 4.76 R Thalamus
32 40 −4 966 4.69 R Orbitofrontal gyrus
44 2 42 254 4.67 R Middle frontal gyrus
20 −58 42 230 4.50 R Precuneus
−16 52 42 203 4.37 L Superior frontal gyrus
52 30 8 169 4.21 L
−42 34 2 172 4.17 R Inferior frontal gyrus
−40 −78 14 156 4.19 L
26 −82 14 86 3.84 R Middle occipital gyrus
−46 −50 0 122 3.66 L Middle temporal gyrus
Emotional perspective taking - controls > patients
Affective responsiveness—controls > patients
−14 −8 40 2365 4.52 L
18 8 42 895 4.27 R Middle cingulate cortex
−10 −62 52 263 4.23 L Precuneus
−38 14 52 96 4.15 L Middle frontal gyrus
−10 −66 14 146 4.01 L Posterior cingulate cortex
−2 34 58 63 3.98 L Superior frontal gyrus
Affective responsiveness—patients > controls