TABLE 2.
Position | Treatment | Root diameter (mm) | SRL (m g–1) | RTD (g cm–3) |
Top part | Control (n = 9) | 0.45 ± 0.03a | 27.0 ± 2.0a | 0.25 ± 0.02a |
Partial-WL (n = 10) | 0.52 ± 0.01a | 23.7 ± 4.0a | 0.24 ± 0.03a | |
Full-WL (n = 7) | 0.52 ± 0.02a | 22.5 ± 1.7a | 0.22 ± 0.01a | |
Bottom part | Control (n = 10) | 0.42 ± 0.01a | 26.0 ± 2.0a | 0.29 ± 0.02a |
Partial-WL (n = 10) | 0.49 ± 0.02b | 23.3 ± 1.1a | 0.24 ± 0.01ab | |
Full-WL (n = 9) | 0.50 ± 0.02b | 22.3 ± 2.0a | 0.24 ± 0.01b |
Mean (±SE) root diameter, specific root length (SRL), and root tissue density (RTD) obtained from IGtotal (n = 7–10) of control, partial waterlogging (partial-WL), and full waterlogging (full-WL). Values in black show results obtained from non-waterlogged soils, and values in blue show results obtained from waterlogged soils. Statistical difference among treatments was tested at the top part and the bottom part, respectively. Results of the Tukey–Kramer’s multiple comparison test or Steel–Dwass multiple comparison test (top and bottom of RTD) are shown with different italic letters indicating statistical differences between treatments (p < 0.05).