Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 10;12:614764. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.614764

TABLE 2.

Fine root morphology obtained from IGtotal.

Position Treatment Root diameter (mm) SRL (m g–1) RTD (g cm–3)
Top part Control (n = 9) 0.45 ± 0.03a 27.0 ± 2.0a 0.25 ± 0.02a
Partial-WL (n = 10) 0.52 ± 0.01a 23.7 ± 4.0a 0.24 ± 0.03a
Full-WL (n = 7) 0.52 ± 0.02a 22.5 ± 1.7a 0.22 ± 0.01a
Bottom part Control (n = 10) 0.42 ± 0.01a 26.0 ± 2.0a 0.29 ± 0.02a
Partial-WL (n = 10) 0.49 ± 0.02b 23.3 ± 1.1a 0.24 ± 0.01ab
Full-WL (n = 9) 0.50 ± 0.02b 22.3 ± 2.0a 0.24 ± 0.01b

Mean (±SE) root diameter, specific root length (SRL), and root tissue density (RTD) obtained from IGtotal (n = 7–10) of control, partial waterlogging (partial-WL), and full waterlogging (full-WL). Values in black show results obtained from non-waterlogged soils, and values in blue show results obtained from waterlogged soils. Statistical difference among treatments was tested at the top part and the bottom part, respectively. Results of the Tukey–Kramer’s multiple comparison test or Steel–Dwass multiple comparison test (top and bottom of RTD) are shown with different italic letters indicating statistical differences between treatments (p < 0.05).