Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 15;7(3):e06467. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06467

Table 2.

The changes in cervical sagittal alignment outcomes in experimental and control groups vs time.

Pre treatment Post treatment 1-year follow 2-year follow up P
G T G Vs t
ARA E 5.5 ± 3.8 18.9 ± 3 [3.9 ] 18.2 ± 3 [3.7 ] 17.7 ± 2.9 [3.6 ] <0.001∗ <0.001∗
<0.001∗
C 7.2 ± 3.9 7.1 ± 3.8 [ 0.01 ] 6.9 ± 3.7 [0.07 ] 6.1 ± 3.6 [0.2 ]
<0.001∗ [9.4 13.9] <0.001∗ [ 9.1 13.4] <0.001∗ [9.4 13.6]
AHT E 25.6 ± 5.9 6.4 ± 2.2 [4.3 ] 6.9 ± 2.4 [4.1] 8.1 ± 2.8 [ 3.8] <0.001∗ <0.001∗ <0.001∗
C 27.2 ± 5.6 26.9 ± 2.3 [0.07 ] 27.7 ± 5.5 [0.09 ] 28.7 ± 4.7 [ .2 ]
<0.001∗ [-2.4, -2.3] <0.001∗ [-2.1, -1.9] <0.001∗ [-2.2, -1.8]

Data are given as mean (sd) [effect size]. ARA: Absolute rotatory angle AHT: Anterior head translation E: experimental group C:control group G: group T: time G vs T: group versus time.

∗ indicates statistically significant difference.