Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 24;372:n532. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n532

Table 2.

Efficacy of interventions for reducing symptoms of depression in people with dementia without a diagnosis of major depressive disorder

Intervention v usual care Studies in pairwise treatment comparison (participant*) Network meta-analysis Meta-analysis†
SMD (95% CrI) SMD re-expressed as MD on CSDD (95% CrI) Probability of MD >0.4 SDs‡ (%) SMD (95% CrI) SMD re-expressed as MD on CSDD (95% CrI) Probability of MD >0.4 SDs‡ (%)
Animal therapy44 1 (23) −0.45 (−1.24 to 0.39) −2.30 (−6.34 to 1.97) 55.6 −0.94 (−1.76 to −0.16) −4.82 (−8.97 to −0.8) 90.9
Cognitive stimulation34 45-56 13 (805) −0.57 (−0.85 to −0.30) −2.93 (−4.35 to −1.52) 90.4 −0.67 (−1.02 to −0.33) −3.42 (−5.19 to −1.69) 94.1
Cognitive stimulation+cholinesterase inhibitor - −2.23 (−3.60 to −0.77) −11.39 (−18.38 to −3.93) 99.3 - - -
Exercise57-62 6 (581) −0.27 (−0.58 to 0.03) −1.39 (−2.94 to 0.14) 21.9 −0.47 (−0.89 to −0.07) −2.42 (−4.55 to −0.34) 63.9
Exercise+social interaction+cognitive stimulation63 1 (14) −2.43 (−3.73 to −1.05) −12.37 (−19.01 to −5.36) 99.8 −2.40 (−3.41 to −1.43) −12.28 (−17.41 to −7.30) 100
Massage and touch therapy64-66 3 (219) −1.77 (−2.41 to −1.15) −9.03 (−12.28 to −5.88) 100 −1.77 (−2.42 to −1.12) −9.05 (−12.35 to −5.70) 100
Multidisciplinary care67-73 7 (838) −0.39 (−0.74 to −0.03) −1.98 (−3.80 to −0.16) 49.1 −0.48 (−0.90 to −0.05) −2.44 (−4.62 to −0.23) 63.9
Occupational therapy74-78 5 (497) −0.51 (−0.92 to −0.08) −2.59 (−4.70 to −0.40) 69.0 −0.5 (−1.02 to 0.02) −2.56 (−5.20 to 0.12) 64.8
Psychotherapy+reminiscence therapy+environmental modification79 1 (51) −1.00 (−2.05 to 0.08) −5.12 (−10.46 to 0.40) 87.2 −0.99 (−1.53 to −0.45) −5.06 (−7.82 to −2.28) 98.4
Reminiscence therapy14 22 80-91 14 (1163) −0.45 (−0.72 to −0.18) −2.30 (−3.68 to −0.93) 65.8 −0.50 (−0.81 to −0.21) −2.57 (−4.12 to −1.06) 75.1

CSDD=Cornell scale for depression in dementia; MA=pairwise meta-analysis; MD=mean difference; CrI=credible interval; SMD=standardised mean difference.

*

Sample sizes adjusted for clustering effect, when appropriate.

Pairwise meta-analysis.

Minimum clinically important difference estimated to be 2.0 at 0.4 standard deviations (SDs) and 2.5 at 0.5 SDs.