Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 17;22(Suppl 1):e13091. doi: 10.1111/obr.13091

TABLE 1.

Basic characteristics of five included studies

First author (year) Study design a (period) Study area b (scale) Sample characteristics Sample size Sample age c Dataset used Statistical model
Ewing (2006) 33 C (1997) US (N) Adolescents 6760 12–17, 18–23 between 1997 and 2003 • Round‐1 (1997) data of 1997 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY97) Multilevel logistic regression
C (2002) Adolescents 5815 • Round‐6 (2002) data of 1997 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY97)
L (1997–2003) Adolescents lived in the same county throughout survey 3367 • All consecutive rounds of NLSY97 from 1997 through 2003
L (1997–2003) Adolescents moved 3567 • The intercounty movers of all consecutive rounds of NLSY97 from 1997 to 2003
Guarnizo‐Herreño (2019) 34 C (2003) C (2007) C (2011–2012) US (N) Children and adolescents 129 781 10–17 between 2003 and 2012 National Surveys of Children's Health (NSCH) Linear probability regression
Guettabi (2014) 35 L (1988–2008) US (N) Children 2324 2–17 between 1988 and 2008 • 1979 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY79)• The NLSY79 Child Survey

• Linear regression

• First difference estimation

Schwartz (2011) 36 C (2001–2008) 31‐county region of Pennsylvania, US (C31) Children and adolescents 47 769 5–18 between 2001 and 2008 • Electronic health record (EHR): individual‐level data• Pennsylvania Spatial Data Access: (PASDA) place‐level data for Pennsylvania Multilevel logistic regression
Seliske (2012) 37 C (2007, 2008) 33 census metropolitan areas (CMA), Canada (C33) Adolescents 7017 12–19 in 2007, 2008 • Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) Multilevel logistic regression

Abbreviation: NA, not available.

a

Study design: C, cross‐sectional; L, longitudinal.

b

Study scale: (N), National; (Nn), n countries; (C), city; (Cn), n cities.

c

Sample age: age in baseline year for cohort studies or mean age in survey year for cross‐sectional studies.