TABLE 2.

Summary table for quality assessment using the Joanna Briggs checklist

Paper congruity	Alexander et al. 35	Ali et al. 38	Ampt et al. 28	Antognoli et al. 27	Ashman et al. 54	Asselin et al. 49	Blackburn et al. 47	Brown et al. 36	Claridge et al. 46	Derksen et al. 42	Douglas et al. 32	Epstein et al. 33	Glenister et al. 50	Gudzune et al. 30	Gunther et al. 43	Hansson et al. 40	Forman‐Hoffman et al. 34	Heintz et al. 41	Huang et al. 31	Jochemsen et al. 39	Kim et al. 48	Leverence et al. 37
Theoretical framework	+	+	+	−	+	+	+	+	+	+	−	+	+	−	+	+	−	+	+	−	+	+
Appropriateness of research design	+	+	‐	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+
Data collection	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	−	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+
Data analysis	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	−	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+
Findings	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+
Context	+	+	+	+	+	−	+	+	−	−	−	+	+	‐	+	+	−	+	+	+	+	+
Impact of investigator	‐	−	‐	−	+	−	‐	−	‐	‐	−	‐	+	−	+	+	‐	−	−	−	+	−
Believability	+	+	‐	‐	+	+	+	+	+	−	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+
Ethics	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	−	+	+	+	−	+	+	−	+	−	−	+	−
Evaluation/outcome	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+	+

Paper congruity	Lee et al. 25	Mercer and Tessier 11	Nolan et al. 26	Phillips et al. 45	Ribera et al. 24	Sonntag et al. 44	Teixeira et al. 4
Theoretical framework	+	+	+	+	+	+	+
Appropriateness of research design	−	+	+	+	+	+	+
Data collection	+	+	+	+	+	+	+
Data analysis	+	+	+	+	+	+	+
Findings	+	+	+	+	+	+	+
Context	+	+	+	+	+	+	+
Impact of investigator	−	−	+	−	−	−	+
Believability	−	+	+	‐	+	+	+
Ethics	+	−	+	+	−	+	+
Evaluation/outcome	−	+	+	+	+	+	+