Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 23;21:160. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01158-7

Table 2.

Comparison between patients pCR and non-pCR

Parameters pCR non-pCR P value
(n = 232) (n = 815)
Age (years) 0.493
 ≦50 132 (23.0%) 443 (77.0%)
 > 50 100 (21.2%) 372 (78.8%)
Clinical T stage  < 0.0001
 T1 17 (42.5%) 23 (57.5%)
 T2 149 (25.6%) 433 (74.4%)
 T3 39 (19.0%) 166 (81.0%)
 T4 27 (12.3%) 193 (87.7%)
Clinical lymph node status  < 0.0001
 N0 19 (24.1%) 60 (75.9%)
 N1 164 (30.2%) 379 (69.8%)
 N2 49 (11.5%) 376 (88.5%)
SBR grade  < 0.0001
 1 4 (5.2%) 73 (94.8%)
 2 51 (12.6%) 354 (87.4%)
 3 110 (23.6%) 356 (76.4%)
 Unknown 67 (67.7%) 32 (32.3%)
ER status  < 0.0001
 Negative 144 (32.9%) 269 (65.1%)
 Positive 88 (13.9%) 546 (86.1%)
PR status  < 0.0001
 Negative 172 (33.1%) 348 (66.9%)
 Positive 60 (11.4%) 467 (88.6%)
HER2 status  < 0.0001
 Negative 78 (13.4%) 503 (86.6%)
 Positive 154 (33.0%) 312 (67.0%)
Subtype  < 0.0001
 HR + /HER2− 27 (6.4%) 392 (93.6%)
 HR + /HER2 +  66 (27.8%) 171 (72.2%)
 HR−/HER2 +  88 (38.4%) 141 (61.6%)
 HR−/HER2− 51 (31.5%) 111 (68.5%)

ER estrogen receptor, HR hormone receptor, HER-2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, pCR pathological complete response