Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 13;65(3):202–209. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_124_20

Table 3.

Faculty response to closed ended questions on Likert scale

Closed-ended questionnaire Participant response {number (percentage)}

Agree Not sure Disagree
DOPS improved my attitude towards resident training 10 (100%)
DOPS assesses more aspects of procedural skills 9 (90%) 1 (10%)
Prior faculty training is necessary to conduct DOPS 6 (60%) 2 (20%) 2 (20%)
DOPS requires more commitment and time 5 (50%) 1 (10%) 4 (40%)
DOPS is an effective teaching learning tool 10 (100%)
DOPS is easy to carry out 9 (90%) 1 (10%)
DOPS can be included in formative assessment 9 (90%) 1 (10%)
DOPS describes criteria for reference 7 (70%) 3 (30%)
DOPS identifies developmental needs of students 10 (100%)
DOPS creates opportunities for learning 8 (80%) 2 (20%)
DOPS improves student-teacher relationship 5 (50%) 5 (50%)
Satisfied with the exercise 8 (80%) 2 (20%)