Table 3.
Faculty response to closed ended questions on Likert scale
Closed-ended questionnaire | Participant response {number (percentage)} | ||
---|---|---|---|
Agree | Not sure | Disagree | |
DOPS improved my attitude towards resident training | 10 (100%) | ||
DOPS assesses more aspects of procedural skills | 9 (90%) | 1 (10%) | |
Prior faculty training is necessary to conduct DOPS | 6 (60%) | 2 (20%) | 2 (20%) |
DOPS requires more commitment and time | 5 (50%) | 1 (10%) | 4 (40%) |
DOPS is an effective teaching learning tool | 10 (100%) | ||
DOPS is easy to carry out | 9 (90%) | 1 (10%) | |
DOPS can be included in formative assessment | 9 (90%) | 1 (10%) | |
DOPS describes criteria for reference | 7 (70%) | 3 (30%) | |
DOPS identifies developmental needs of students | 10 (100%) | ||
DOPS creates opportunities for learning | 8 (80%) | 2 (20%) | |
DOPS improves student-teacher relationship | 5 (50%) | 5 (50%) | |
Satisfied with the exercise | 8 (80%) | 2 (20%) |