TABLE 2.
Gigaspora sp. MUCL 52331 | Rhizophagus irregularis MUCL 41833 | ||||||
Fungicide concentration (mg L–1) | β | Hazard ratio | P-value | β | Hazard ratio | P-value | |
Azoxystrobin | |||||||
GHT emission | 0.02 | −0.392 | 0.676 | 0.296 | −0.457 | 0.633 | 0.187 |
2 | −2.009 | 0.134 | <0.001 | −0.685 | 0.504 | 0.056 | |
GHT contact | 0.02 | −0.424 | 0.655 | 0.259 | −0.200 | 0.818 | 0.613 |
2 | −2.444 | 0.064 | <0.001 | −1.147 | 0.317 | 0.020 | |
GHT fusion | 0.02 | −0.568 | 0.567 | 0.140 | −0.345 | 0.708 | 0.416 |
2 | −3.129 | 0.044 | <0.001 | −1.224 | 0.294 | 0.021 | |
Pencycuron | |||||||
GHT emission | 0.02 | 0.083 | 1.086 | 0.847 | 0.484 | 1.623 | 0.164 |
2 | 0.124 | 1.133 | 0.748 | 0.520 | 1.682 | 0.154 | |
GHT contact | 0.02 | 0.243 | 1.275 | 0.578 | 0.114 | 1.120 | 0.749 |
2 | −0.050 | 0.951 | 0.901 | −0.135 | 0.873 | 0.728 | |
GHT fusion | 0.02 | −0.092 | 0.912 | 0.840 | 0.258 | 1.295 | 0.506 |
2 | −0.311 | 0.733 | 0.464 | −0.151 | 0.860 | 0.725 | |
Flutolanil | |||||||
GHT emission | 0.02 | 0.628 | 1.873 | 0.073 | NA | NA | NA |
2 | 0.403 | 1.496 | 0.267 | NA | NA | NA | |
GHT contact | 0.02 | 0.178 | 1.195 | 0.633 | 0.075 | 1.078 | 0.825 |
2 | 0.539 | 1.714 | 0.144 | 0.002 | 1.002 | 0.995 | |
GHT fusion | 0.02 | 0.049 | 1.050 | 0.899 | 0.139 | 1.149 | 0.709 |
2 | −0.222 | 0.801 | 0.569 | 0.120 | 1.127 | 0.752 | |
Fenpropimorph | |||||||
GHT emission | 0.02 | 0.139 | 1.149 | 0.711 | 1.275 | 3.580 | <0.001 |
2 | −0.415 | 0.661 | 0.282 | −0.345 | 0.708 | 0.334 | |
GHT contact | 0.02 | −0.475 | 0.622 | 0.201 | 0.805 | 2.238 | 0.033 |
2 | −0.414 | 0.661 | 0.263 | −1.294 | 0.274 | 0.007 | |
GHT fusion | 0.02 | −0.538 | 0.584 | 0.185 | 0.638 | 1.893 | 0.109 |
2 | −0.247 | 0.781 | 0.533 | −1.224 | 0.294 | 0.019 |
Values were considered significant at P < 0.05 compared to the acetone control treatment. β = Regression coefficient. Hazard ratio = Exp (β). NA, Not applicable.