Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 3;11(1):10–15. doi: 10.1159/000512120

Table 2.

Demographic data, intervention method, and DEOS score after intervention

Case Facility Diagnosis Sex Age, years LTCI level1 IL2 CDR Intervention method 18-item DEOS total score
baseline 1 month 2 months
1 HVR DLB F 91 3 IIb 1 rehabilitation 63 65.5 64
2 OP AD F 90 1 IIb 2 aromatherapy massage 51 57 59
3 HVN AD F 85 1 IIa 0.5 occupational therapy 64 64 66
4 HVN VaD F 77 4 IIIa 2 aromatherapy massage 52 54 55
5 OP AD F 81 2 IIb 2 grooming (makeup), face 61 62 63
massage
6 OP AD F 82 1 IIb 2 sing a song 48 50 50
7 OP DLB M 77 3 IIb 1 encourage active communication 49 50 52
8 OP AD M 78 1 IIb 1 encourage leadership 52 57 59
9 HVR AD F 82 1 IIb 0.5 rehabilitation 68 69 68
10 GH AD F 86 3 IIb 2 aromatherapy massage 52 49 49
11 OP AD F 68 1 IIb 2 occupational therapy 53.5 47 47
12 HVN AD F 76 1 IIb 1 aromatherapy massage 64 63 58
13 GH AD F 74 3 IIIa 2 aromatherapy massage 56 55 55

AD, Alzheimer's disease; CDR, Clinical Dementia Rating; DEOS, Dementia Elderly Odayaka Scale; DLB, dementia with Lewy bodies; GH, group home for persons with dementia; HVN, home-visit nursing; HVR, home-visit rehabilitation; IL, independency level; LTCI, long-term care insurance; OP, outpatient long-term day care; VaD, vascular dementia.

1

Level 1: low; level 5: high.

2

IIa: almost independent; IIb: independence if someone is careful; IIIa: need some support; IIIb: need more support.