Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 29;7(1):1–16. doi: 10.1159/000508613

Table 3.

Previous studies analyzing the value of miRNAs in UM

Title Reference Patient number Major findings
Circulating immune cell and microRNA in patients with uveal melanoma developing metastatic disease Achberger et al. [58], 2014 UM patients (n = 6) plasma levels of miR-20a, miR-125b, miR-146a, miR-155, miR-181a, and miR-233 higher in UM patients compared to healthy controls; upon development of metastasis, all miRs with the exception of miR-181a increased from the time of diagnosis

miRNA profiling in vitreous humor, vitreal exosomes and serum from uveal melanoma patients: pathological and diagnostic implications Ragusa et al. [55], 2015 UM patients (n = 6) 32 miRNAs found to be differentially expressed in UM patients compared to healthy controls; vitreous humor circulating miRNA profile only partially overlaps that in serum; miR-146a was found to be upregulated in serum of UM patients, a potential circulating marker

Increased levels of miRNA-146a in serum and histologic samples of patients with uveal melanoma Russo et al. [56], 2016 UM patients (n = 14) SAM analysis showed 8 serum miRNAs to be differentially expressed between patients and controls; when singularly validated with TaqMan assays, only significant overexpression of miRNA-146a was found

A panel of circulating microRNAs detects uveal melanoma with high precision Stark et al. [57], 2019 uveal nevus (n = 10); localized UM (n = 50); metastatic UM (n = 5) 6 miRNAs (miR-16, miR-145, miR-146a, miR-204, miR-211, and miR-363-3p) were differentially expressed between uveal nevi compared to localized or metastatic UM; miR-211 had the ability to distinguish metastatic from localized UM; the 6 miRNAs together had 93% sensitivity and 100% specificity in identifying UM

miRNA, microRNA; UM, uveal melanoma.