Skip to main content
. 2015 May;36(5):930–936. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4201

Fig 4.

Fig 4.

Responses to question 2 (Any other treatment option?). In all cases, judges were able to find a viable alternative to flow diversion. The cases with the largest number of votes for “No, flow diversion only” were a ruptured supraclinoid carotid blister aneurysm (A, 5 votes) and a giant basilar aneurysm with an associated AVM (B, 4 votes). All other aneurysm-patient combinations were thought to have >1 treatment option.