Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 11;12:581430. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.581430

TABLE 3.

Associations of OTUs to environmental factors, biogeographic regions, land-use types and bacterial community types (BCTs).

Environmental factorsa Totalb Non-redundantc Maximum of rPBg


Associated OTUs [N]d Rel. abund. [%]e Associated OTUs [N]d Rel. abund. [%]e Cumul.f [N] Cumul.f [%]
pH 1,788 45.6 1,788 45.6 1,788 45.6 0.78
Plant ind.h for pH 1,406 30.9 535 3.4 2,323 49.0 0.79
Plant ind.h for nutrients 589 7.0 454 1.5 2,777 50.5 0.78
SD of monthly precipitationi 148 3.8 39 0.1 2,816 50.7 0.68
Bulk density 70 1.3 31 0.5 2,847 51.1 0.62
Elevation 47 3.1 10 0.2 2,857 51.3 0.60
Soil water content 33 0.7 10 0.1 2,867 51.4 0.57
Biogeographic region 86 4.4 16 0.3 2,883 51.7 0.63
Land-use type 287 6.4 66 0.9 2,933 52.6 0.74
Bacterial community types 2,931 58.7 1,049 11.8 3,998 64.4 0.81

aEnvironmental factors were ordered according to the number of associated OTUs, followed by biogeographic region, land-use type and bacterial community types.

bAssociated OTUs to each factor individually and their relative abundance.

cAssociated OTUs to pH and number of associated OTUs to each factor in addition along the column in the table, thereby excluding redundant OTUs.

dSelection of OTUs with a Benjamini and Hochberg adjusted p-value below 0.05 and rPB larger than 0.5 based on all sites which were available for each factor.

eRelative sequence abundance.

fCumulative.

grPB, point biserial correlation coefficient, which is used in case one of the variables is dichotomous.

hPlant indicator.

iInter-annual standard deviation of monthly precipitation sums between 1981 and 2010.