. 2021 Mar 10;14(2):107–129. doi: 10.1007/s12178-021-09697-5

Table 3.

Study characteristics of the abstract included in the systematic review (n = 1)

Author Date Country Design	Type of fracture	Number of included patients (N) Participants	Intervention vs. comparison	Outcome measures and follow-up	Results
Bache et al. July 2000 England RCT	DRF Non-operatively treated	N = 98 Mean age in years: 69 Female/male: 82/16	Intervention: Supervised exercise therapy and advice Comparison: Non-supervised exercise therapy and advise	Range of motion (ROM) Grip strength Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Follow-up: 4 and 12 weeks	Supervised exercise therapy resulted in a greater increase of the supination (p = 0.04) No between-group difference in any of the other outcomes at any follow-up

Author
Date
Country
Design

Type of fracture

Number of included patients (N)
Participants

Intervention vs. comparison

Outcome measures and follow-up

Results

Bache et al.

July 2000

England

RCT

DRF

Non-operatively treated

N = 98

Mean age in years:

Female/male:

82/16

Intervention:

Supervised exercise therapy and advice

Comparison:

Non-supervised exercise therapy and advise

Range of motion (ROM)

Grip strength

Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Follow-up: 4 and 12 weeks

Supervised exercise therapy resulted in a greater increase of the supination (p = 0.04)

No between-group difference in any of the other outcomes at any follow-up

The table provides available information regarding the participants, the interventions and comparisons, the outcomes, the follow-up times, and results.