TABLE 2.
2011 | 2012 | ||||||
Control | ASA1 | ASA2 | Control | ASA1 | ASA2 | ||
% CR | S-side | 54.6 ± 7.4 B | 52.7 ± 3.7 | 58.1 ± 6.5 | 47.0 ± 6.4 B | 42.9 ± 5.7 | 48.3 ± 8.8 |
N-side | 74.0 ± 11.1 A | 68.8 ± 12.2 | 81.4 ± 7.6 | 73.8 ± 7.0 A | 48.5 ± 9.7 | 54.9 ± 13.5 | |
% RS | S-side | 2.1 ± 2.1 B | 2.3 ± 2.3 B | 0.0 ± 0.0 B | 25.3 ± 2.4 aB | 17.4 ± 2.7 bB | 21.9 ± 5.1 ab |
N-side | 57.3 ± 16.7 aA | 17.4 ± 5.8 bA | 30.0 ± 9.4 abA | 41.1 ± 3.6 aA | 32.2 ± 5.4 bA | 29.8 ± 5.4 ab | |
% SS | S-side | 40.2 ± 5.3 A | 32.5 ± 2.6 A | 42.1 ± 8.5 A | 33.0 ± 2.3 A | 26.9 ± 3.2 A | 28.6 ± 2.4 A |
N-side | 0 ± 0 B | 0 ± 0 B | 0 ± 0 B | 13.9 ± 2.1 B | 11.4 ± 2.1 B | 20.5 ± 4.8 B | |
Total% CR | 62.0 ± 7.6 | 55.4 ± 1.6 | 68.8 ± 5.0 | 53.5 ± 5.0 | 45.4 ± 5.9 | 49.8 ± 9.8 | |
Total% RS | 23.3 ± 3.6 a | 10.1 ± 3.6 b | 22.4 ± 4.7 a | 30.2 ± 3.2 a | 22.9 ± 3.2 b | 24.9 ± 5.0 b | |
Total% SS | 22.8 ± 2.6 | 19.8 ± 4.9 | 21.9 ± 4.2 | 23.3 ± 1.3 | 21.0 ± 2.6 | 25.4 ± 2.6 | |
P values | ASA | Year | Position | ASA × Year | ASA × Position | Year x Position | Year x ASA x Position |
%CR | 0.420 | 0.055 | 0.003 | 0.594 | 0.715 | 0.493 | 0.736 |
%RS | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.071 | 0.009 | 0.000 | 0.006 |
%SS | 0.124 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.994 | 0.613 | 0.000 | 0.260 |
Trees were sprayed with 0.5 mM, 1.0 mM acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), while control trees were unsprayed. Measurements were made 2 days before the first commercial harvest in 2011 and 2012. Means followed with the same lower case letters are not significantly different at P < 0.05 across spraying treatments, and with capital letters across S- and N-side positions in the canopy.