TABLE 4.
2011 | 2012 | ANOVA | |||||||
Control | ASA1 | ASA2 | Control | ASA1 | ASA2 | ASA | Year | Year x ASA | |
SSC | 16.2 ± 0.2 | 16.7 ± 0.2 | 16.1 ± 0.3 | 16.6 ± 0.2 | 17.1 ± 0.3 | 16.5 ± 0.2 | 0.030 | 0.040 | 0.996 |
TA | 28.0 ± 1.5 | 30.1 ± 1.3 | 30.0 ± 1.3 | 23.8 ± 1.8 | 25.1 ± 1.4 | 28.3 ± 1.1 | 0.182 | 0.011 | 0.513 |
MI | 5.9 ± 0.3 | 5.6 0.3 | 6.5 ± 0.3 | 7.2 ± 0.5 | 6.9 ± 0.3 | 5.9 ± 0.3 | 0.072 | 0.001 | 0.335 |
TPs | 2,427.8 ± 52.7 | 2,488.0 ± 58.0 | 2,452.8 ± 91.7 | 1,897.0 ± 42.7 | 1,830.7 ± 78.2 | 1,905.2 ± 96.5 | 0.959 | <0.001 | 0.661 |
TACDPPH | 2,450.4 ± 28.8 a | 2,606.2 ± 59.4 b | 2,434.3 ± 68.7 ab | 2,607.6 ± 36.1 | 2,801.2 ± 30.4 | 2,734.3 ± 29.7 | 0.475 | 0.189 | 0.007 |
Ascorbic acid | 21.4 ± 0.7 | 22.7 ± 0.9 | 20.6 ± 1.5 | 18.7 ± 0.6 | 19.5 ± 1.2 | 19.0 ± 0.7 | 0.401 | 0.005 | 0.716 |
% edible portion | 46.0 ± 0.7 | 48.1 ± 0.5 | 48.2 ± 0.7 | 49.0 ± 1.9 | 48.7 ± 3.7 | 47.6 ± 4.2 | 0.880 | 0.512 | 0.601 |
% juice | 31.5 ± 0.7 | 33.2 ± 0.6 | 31.3 ± 0.5 | 34.3 ± 1.5 | 33.7 ± 2.6 | 33.0 ± 3.2 | 0.657 | 0.148 | 0.708 |
100 seed weight | 38.1 ± 0.7 | 37.1 ± 1.0 | 36.9 ± 0.9 | 35.5 ± 0.8 | 35.5 ± 0.7 | 35.3 ± 0.9 | 0.773 | 0.054 | 0.830 |
% red | 35.0 ± 4.0 b | 65.0 ± 3.8 a | 67.0 ± 6.0a | <0.001 | |||||
L* | 55.1 ± 1.1 a | 47.1 ± 0.8 b | 45.6 ± 1.2 b | <0.001 | |||||
a* | 43.6 ± 1.2 b | 50.2 ± 1.0 a | 51.2 ± 1.1 a | <0.001 | |||||
b* | 21.7 ± 0.3 | 22.4 ± 0.5 | 22.6 ± 0.7 | 0.220 | |||||
H* | 26.6 ± 0.4 a | 22.9 ± 0.4 b | 23.8 ± 0.7 b | <0.001 | |||||
C* | 48.7 ± 1.0 b | 54.2 ± 0.6 a | 56.0 ± 0.9 a | <0.001 |
ANOVA results from the effects of year and ASA treatment and their interaction are presented. Means with different letters are significantly different at P < 0.05 in the same year. The asteristics is part of CIELAB color parameter identifications.