Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar;25(3):284–291. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23759

Table 5.

Performance of CPIS, CPIS-mic, CPIS-cult, SPIS, SPIS-mic, and SPIS-cult at inclusion for diagnosis of VAP (mini-BAL culture confirmed)

Parameters Sensitivity% Specificity% PPV% NPV% LR+ LR-
CPIS ≥ 6 57.5 (45.9–68.5) 60 (40.6–77.3) 79.3 (66.6–88.8) 34.6 (21.9–49.1) 1.43 (0.89–2.32) 0.71 (0.48–1.04)
CIPS mic ≥ 6 71.3 (60.1–80.8) 60 (40.6–77.3) 82.6 (71.7–90.7) 43.9 (28.5–60.3) 1.70 (1.1–2.8) 0.48 (0.3–0.8)
CPIS cult ≥ 6 78.8 (68.2–87.1) 63.3 (43.9–80.1) 85.1 (74.9–92.3) 53 (35.5–69.6) 2.15 (1.3–3.5) 0.34 (0.2–0.6)
SPIS ≥ 6 46.3 (35–57.8) 73.3 (54.1–87.7) 82.2 (67.9–92) 33.9 (22.6–46.7) 1.37 (0.9–3.3) 0.73 (0.5–0.9)
SPIS mic ≥ 6 77.5 (66.8–86.1) 76.7 (57.7–90.1) 89.9 (80.2–95.8) 56.1 (39.8–71.5) 3.32 (1.7–6.4) 0.3 (0.2–0.5)
SPIS cult ≥ 6 87.5 (78.2–93.8) 76.7 (57.7–90.1) 90.9 (82.2–96.3) 69.7 (51.3–84.4) 3.8 (1.9–7.2) 0.2 (0.1–0.3)

Notes: Data are presented as % (95% CI). CPIS, clinical pulmonary infection score; LR+, positive likelihood ratio, LR−, negative likelihood ratio; LUS, lung ultrasound; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; SPIS, sono-pulmonary infection score