Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 26;51(1):148–158. doi: 10.3906/sag-2003-42

Table 3.

Correlation between KRAS/ NRAS mutations and clinicopathological features.

Clinicopathological features Number KRAS status NRAS status
Wild typeN = 56 (%) Mutant typeN = 40 (%) P-value Wild typeN = 89 (%) Mutant typeN = 7 (%) P-value
Age (years)
≥60 (n = 65) 65 33 (58.9) 32 (80) 0.029 62 (69.7) 3 (42.9) 0.149
<60 (n = 31) 31 23 (41.1) 8 (20) 27 (30.3) 4 (57.1)
Sex
Male (n = 60) 60 36 (64.3) 24 (60) 0.669 54 (60.7) 6 (85.7) 0.184
Female (n = 36) 36 20 (35.7) 16 (40) 35 (39.3) 1 (14.3)
Tumor location
Right colon (n = 25) 25 19 (33.9) 6 (15) 0.037 22 (24.7) 3 (42.9) 0.260
Left colon (n = 71) 71 37 (66.1) 34 (85) 67 (75.3) 4 (57.1)
Histological type
NMC (n = 67) 67 35 (62.5) 32 (80) 0.066 64 (71.9) 3 (42.9) 0.120
MC (n = 29) 29 21 (37.5) 8 (20) 25 (28.1) 4 (57.1)
Differentiation
Well (n = 47) 47 22 (39.3) 25 (62.5) 45 (50.6) 2 (28.6) 0.151
Moderate (n = 46) 46 31 (55.4) 15 (37.5) 0.044 42 (47.2) 4 (57.1)
Poor (n = 3) 3 3 (5.3) 0 (0) 2 (2.2) 1 (14.3)
Stages
I, II (n = 32) 32 19 (33.9) 13 (32.5) 0.884 27 (30.3) 5 (71.4) 0.039
II, IV (n = 64) 64 37 (66.1) 27 (67.5) 62 (69.7) 2 (28.6)
Lymph node metastasis
No (n = 33) 33 21 (37.5) 12 (30) 0.446 28 (31.5) 5 (71.4) 0.045
Yes (n = 63) 63 35 (62.5) 28 (70) 61(68.5) 2 (28.6)