Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 10;9(3):e21331. doi: 10.2196/21331

Table 2.

Classification performance of the supervised models with the classification threshold set at 95%.

Classification performance (%)
Model and metrics Ca vs Bb C vs NBc B vs NB C vs ALSd
Random forest
Accuracy 58.3 56.1 68.8 75.1
Sensitivity 4.8 30.4 0.0 65.6
Specificity 100.0 100.0 100.0 98.8
Naïve Bayes
Accuracy 82.3 68.8 72.8 75.1
Sensitivity 64.7 54.6 15.8 65.6
Specificity 96.1 93.3 98.6 98.8
Logistic regression
Accuracy 92.8 77.7 74.1 76.0
Sensitivity 84.8 65.1 16.7 66.4
Specificity 99.0 99.6 100.0 100.0
Linear discriminant analysis
Accuracy 88.1 70.6 71.7 71.1
Sensitivity 72.7 53.5 0.9 59.5
Specificity 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Neuronal network
Accuracy 92.6 84.8 73.1 86.8
Sensitivity 83.2 76.1 20.5 81.6
Specificity 100.0 100.0 96.8 99.8
Support vector machine
Accuracy 86.3 71.1 70.7 71.1
Sensitivity 68.8 54.3 6.1 59.4
Specificity 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

aC: control group.

bB: patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) with bulbar involvement.

cNB: patients with ALS without bulbar involvement.

dALS: all patients with ALS.