Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Fam Psychol. 2016 Apr 7;30(4):453–469. doi: 10.1037/fam0000191

Table 4.

Effect Sizes Moderated by Study Characteristics

Moderator N in each subcategory β for difference from referent Significant differences among subgroups

Study design (referent = cross-sectional) 61
 Longitudinal 23 −.07
 Retrospective 23 −.03
 Experimental 4 −.50
Measure (referent = parent report) 65
 Observation 6 −.10
 Child report 11 .03
 Child retrospective 26 −.03
 Both parent and child 3 −.10
Index of spanking (referent = frequency) 79
 Frequency and severity 8 −.11
 Ever in life 15 −.06
 When used 5 −.29
 Ever in time period 4 −.18
Raters of spanking and outcome (referent = same rater) 42
 Independent raters 67 −.04
Time period (referent = not specified) 51
 Observation 6 −.10
 Last week 22 .01
 Last month 3 −.26
 Last year 8 .16
 Ever 8 −.17
 Hypothetical 1 −.40
 Specific time period 12 −.04
Country (referent = U.S.) 77
 Other than U.S. 34 .04
Age range of children at time of spanking (referent = 2- to 5-years-old) 36
 Less than 2-years-old 15 .17
 6- to 10-years-old 30 .05
 11- to 15-years-old 27 .01

Note. βs in third column represent difference from the β for the referent category. None were significantly different from the β for the referent category.