Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 2;31(1):6–13. doi: 10.5021/ad.2019.31.1.6

Table 1. Different characteristics of facial scars according to treatment onset.

Factors Onset of Tx* p-value
m<1 1≤m<6 6≤m
Sex
 Female 10 (45.5) 13 (81.2) 26 (56.5) 0.076
 Male 12 (54.5) 3 (18.8) 20 (43.5)
Age (y)
 y<10 9 (40.9) 3 (18.8) 0 (0.0) <0.001
 10≤y<20 2 (9.1) 0 (0.0) 13 (28.3)
 20≤y<30 6 (27.3) 4 (25.0) 14 (30.4)
 30≤y<40 1 (4.5) 0 (0.0) 11 (23.9)
 40≤y<50 1 (4.5) 4 (25.0) 4 (8.7)
 50≤y 3 (13.6) 5 (31.2) 4 (8.7)
Location
 Forehead 7 (31.8) 5 (31.2) 7 (15.2) 0.030
 Nose 4 (18.2) 3 (18.8) 4 (8.7)
 Perioral area 2 (9.1) 4 (25.0) 7 (15.2)
 Cheek 4 (18.2) 2 (12.5) 24 (52.2)
 Periocular area 5 (22.7) 2 (12.5) 4 (8.7)
Cause
 Trauma 9 (40.9) 7 (43.8) 13 (28.3) 0.338
 Operation 13 (59.1) 7 (43.8) 24 (52.2)
 Burn 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 4 (8.7)
 Others 0 (0.0) 2 (12.5) 5 (10.9)
Type
 Flat 14 (63.6) 1 (6.2) 4 (8.7) <0.001
 Atrophic 0 (0.0) 2 (12.5) 11 (23.9)
 Hypertrophic 6 (27.3) 7 (43.8) 19 (41.3)
 Adhesive 2 (9.1) 6 (37.5) 12 (26.1)
Initial VSS
 <5 13 (59.1) 5 (31.2) 22 (47.8) 0.268
 ≥5
Laser modality 9 (40.9) 11 (68.8) 24 (52.2)
 PDL only 2 (9.1) 0 (0.0) 3 (6.5) 0.296
 NAFL only 10 (45.5) 9 (56.2) 31 (67.4)
 PDL and NAFL both 10 (45.5) 7 (43.8) 12 (26.1)
Corticosteroid injection
 No 14 (63.6) 11 (68.8) 34 (73.9) 0.691
 Yes 8 (34.4) 5 (31.2) 12 (26.1)
Tx response
 Good 11 (50.0) 6 (37.5) 9 (19.6) 0.059
 Moderate 8 (36.4) 5 (31.2) 18 (39.1)
 Poor 3 (13.6) 2 (12.5) 15 (32.6)
 Resistant 0 (0.0) 3 (18.8) 4 (8.7)

Values are presented as number (%). Percentages may not add up to 100 due to rounding. Tx: treatment, m: months, y: years, VSS: Vancouver scar scale, PDL: 595-nm pulsed-dye laser, NAFL: non-ablative fractional laser. *The period between the injury and initiation of laser treatment. Used laser modalities were selected via an algorithm according to the state of individual scars. p<.05.