Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 11;11:617335. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.617335

Table 1.

A brief update on various approvals granted by FDA for immune checkpoint inhibitors linked to PD-L1 detection in the past 3 years.

Trial Tumor type Drug Year of approval Line of therapy PD-L1 threshold Companion diagnostic Number of patients Endpoint Results
KEYNOTE-355 TNBC Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy VS Placebo + chemotherapy 2020 1st CPSc ≥ 10 IHC 22C3 566 PFS, OS Median PFS: 9.7 vs. 5.6 m
IMpower110 adult patients with NSCLC Atezolizumab VS Platinum-based chemotherapy 2020 1st TC ≥ 50% or IC ≥ 10% SP142 277 OS Median OS: 20.2 vs 13.1 m Median PFS: 8.1 vs. 5.0 m
CHECKMATE-227 (Part 1a) NSCLC Nivolumab+ ipilimumab VS Platinum-doublet chemotherapy 2020 1st TC ≥ 1% IHC 28-8 396 OS Median OS: 17.1 vs. 14.9 m
KEYNOTE-181 ESCCa Pembrolizumab VS Chemotherapy 2019 2nd CPS ≥10 IHC 22C3 85 OS Median OS: 10.3 vs. 6.7 m
KEYNOTE-180 Pembrolizumab 3rd 121 ORR, response duration ORR: 20%
KEYNOTE-042 NSCLC Pembrolizumab V.S Carboplatin-containing chemotherapy 2019 1st TPSd ≥ 1% IHC 22C3 637 OS Median OS: TPS ≥ 1%: 16.7 vs. 12.1 m TPS ≥ 20%: 17.7 vs. 13.0 m TPS ≥ 50%: 20 vs. 12.2 m
IMpassion130 TNBC Atezolizumab + nab-paclitaxel VS Placebo + nab-paclitaxel 2019 1st IC ≥ 1% SP142 451 PFS, OS Median OS: 7.4 vs. 4.8 m
KEYNOTE-048 subgroups HNSCC Pembrolizumab VS Cetuximab plus chemotherapy 2019 CPS ≥ 1 IHC 22C3 301 OS Median OS: CPS ≥1: 12.3 vs. 10.3 m CPS ≥ 20: 14.9 vs. 10.7 m
KEYNOTE-158 Cervical cancer Pembrolizumab 2018 2nd CPS ≥ 1 IHC 22C3 98 ORR ORR:14.3%b
KEYNOTE-059 Gastric/GEJ Pembrolizumab 2017 3rd CPS ≥ 1 IHC 22C3 259 ORR Overall ORR: 11.6% PD-L1+:15.5% PD-L1-: 6.4%
NCT01693562 Urothelial carcinoma Durvalumab 2017 2nd TC or IC≥ 25% SP263 191 ORR Overall ORR: 17.8% PD-L1+:27.6% PD-L1-: 5.1%
a

Efficacy of pembrolizumab was investigated in two clinical trials, KEYNOTE-181 and KEYNOTE-180.

b

ORR was 14.3% with a median follow-up time of 11.7 months in 77 patients with PD-L1–positive tumors. No responses were observed in patients whose tumors did not have PD-L1 expression.

c

TPS is calculated as the ratio between the number of PD-L1+ tumor cells and the total number of tumor cells.

d

CPS is calculated as the ratio between the number of all PD-L1+ cells and the total number of cells.

TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer; CPS, combined positive score; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; GEJ, gastroesophageal junction; IC, immune cells; TC, tumor cells; TPS, tumor proportion score; HNSCC, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; ESCC, squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.