Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Feb 24;54(5):1123–1133. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00129-z

Table 5.

Frequency of VTs in Clinical Investigator Warning Letters.

VT# Violation Theme CDER n = 98 CDRH n = 56 CBER n = 10 Total n = 164 P value
1 Deviation from investigational plan 93 (95%) 52 (93%) 9 (90%) 154 (94%) 0.5493
2 Failure to maintain adequate/accurate source documentation 61 (62%) 39 (70%) 8 (80%) 108 (66%) 0.4161
3 Informed consent 36 (37%) 33 (59%) 6 (60%) 75 (46%) 0.0184
4 Violations related to investigational product 32 (33%) 13 (23%) 4 (40%) 49 (30%) 0.3497
5 Failure to personally supervise the study 22 (22%) 4 (7%) 0 26 (16%) 0.0191
6 Failure to protect subject safety/report adverse events to IRBs/communicate with the IRB 31 (32%) 19 (34%) 3 (30%) 53 (32%) 0.9616
7 Submission of false information to the FDA and sponsor 1 (1%) 0 0 1 (1%) 1.0000
8 Failure to communicate with the sponsor 3 (3%) 1 (2%) 0 4 (2%) 1.0000
9 Financial disclosure 0 1 (2%) 0 1 (1%) 0.4024