Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 12;5(6):1638–1647. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003645

Table 2.

Distribution of first-line chemotherapy regimens among stage IB+ MCL patients up to 65 y of age at diagnosis in Sweden between January 2000 and June 2014, by selection to treatment with AHCT within 18 mo of diagnosis

Treatment n (col %) AHCT ≤18 mo (col %) No AHCT ≤18 mo (col %)
NLG-MCL2/MCL3 protocol 193 (52.3) 165 (74.7) 28 (18.9)
R-CHOP alternating with R-cytarabine or R-cytarabine single* 16 (4.3) 4 (1.8) 12 (8.1)
R-CHOP/CHOEP/COP* 38 (10.3) 5 (2.3) 33 (22.3)
Chlorambucil 12 (3.3) 0 (0.0) 12 (8.1)
R-fludarabine/cyclophosphamide* 4 (1.1) 0 (0.0) 4 (1.1)
R-bendamustine* 4 (1.1) 0 (0.0) 4 (1.1)
Wait and watch 10 (2.7) 0 (0.0) 10 (6.8)
Radiotherapy only 7 (1.9) 0 (0.0) 7 (4.7)
Other treatment 4 (1.1)
Missing 81 (22.0) 46 (20.8) 35 (23.7)
Total 369 (100) 221 (100) 148 (100)

Due to rounding, not all percentages add up to 100.

CHO(E)P, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin (etoposide), and prednisone; NLG-MCL2/MCL3 protocol Nordic lymphoma group: mantle cell lymphoma 2 and 3 protocol containing dose-intensified cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and prednisone in combination with rituximab alternating high-dose cytarabine.

*

12 out of 16 patients received rituximab in the CHOP/cytarabine group; 23 out of 38 in the CHOP/CHOEP/COP group; 1 out of 4 in the fludarabine/cyclophosphamide group, and all patients in the bendamustine group.

Either R-bendamustine alternating with R-cytarabine, or unspecified chemotherapy; detailed frequencies not shown in subgroups due to cell count <4.