Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 12;5(6):1638–1647. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003645

Table 4.

HRs with 95% CIs comparing all-cause mortality between AHCT and non-AHCT treated stage IB+ MCL patients diagnosed between January 2000 and June 2014 aged up to 65 y at diagnosis, who were alive 6 mo after diagnosis when follow-up started (n = 363)

HR* (95% CI) HR (95% CI)
Age at diagnosis AHCT (n = 363) (n = 342)
All ages Yes 0.45 (0.32-0.63) 0.58 (0.40-0.85)
No 1.00 1.00
≤49 y Yes 0.43 (0.14-1.35) 0.38 (0.12-1.19)
No 1.00 1.00
50 to 59 y Yes 0.47 (0.26-0.86) 0.55 (0.29-1.02)
No 1.00 1.00
60 to 65 y Yes 0.53 (0.34-0.84) 0.70 (0.43-1.14)
No 1.00 1.00

Follow-up was restricted to the first 10 y after diagnosis.

*

From a Cox proportional hazards model treating AHCT as a time-varying exposure (for age-stratified results, an interaction between AHCT and age at diagnosis was included).

From a Cox proportional hazards model as above, adjusted for calendar year of diagnosis (as a restricted cubic spline), sex, civil status, educational level, CCI, stage, and performance status.

A nonsignificant interaction with AHCT and age was seen, indicating that the association between AHCT and all-cause mortality was similar between age groups.