Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 28;14(2):536–543. doi: 10.1111/cts.12902

Table 2.

Relative contribution of parent and active metabolites to total Css/IC50 a

Drug Analyte AUC0‐12 ng.h/mL fup

Css

nM

IC50

nM

Css/IC50 Total Css/IC50 Cell line
Abemaciclib Parent 3,844 0.0300 18.97 19.0 1.00 4.14 EFM‐19
M2 1,499 0.1100 28.77 19.0 1.51 EFM‐19
M18 538 0.0900 8.18 190.0 0.04 EFM‐19
M20 3,152 0.0600 30.16 19.0 1.59 EFM‐19
Dabrafenib Parent 4,341 0.0040 2.79 6.0 0.46 1.57 COLO205
M4 47751 0.0050 35.30 320.0 0.11 COLO205
M7 3907 0.0370 22.49 23.0 0.98 COLO205
M8 3039 0.0010 0.50 23.0 0.02 COLO205

AUC0–12, area under the plasma concentration‐time curve from zero to 12; Css, steady‐state concentration; IC50, half‐maximal inhibitory concentration; fup, fraction of unbound drug in plasma.

a

M2, M18, and M20 are the N‐desethyl, hydroxy‐N‐desethyl, and hydroxy metabolites, respectively, of abemaciclib. M4, M7, and M8 are the carboxy, hydroxy, and desmethyl metabolites, respectively, of dabrafenib. For abemaciclib, metabolite AUCs were estimated from reported exposures relative to parent in a single dose study. M18 was reported to have activity 3 to 20‐fold less than parent, 15 therefore, a 10‐fold lower potency was used in the table. A 3‐fold lower potency would result in a Css/IC50 value of 0.14 vs. 0.04 for M18 with minimal difference in the total Css/IC50 value.