Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Addict Rep. 2020 Nov 10;7(4):486–496. doi: 10.1007/s40429-020-00344-6

Table 2.

Results from a linear regression model using APA Screener “total score” as the criterion, and each of the app popularity metrics as predictors (apps N = 59). The model indicates that app popularity did not predict app quality.

Predictor b b 95% CI beta beta 95% CI Fit
(Intercept) 0.52** [0.44, 0.59]
Number of Installs 0.00 [−0.00, 0.00] 2.18 [−0.36, 4.71]
Average Stars Rating 0.02 [−0.02, 0.05] 0.14 [−0.16, 0.44]
Number of Ratings −0.00 [−0.01, 0.00] −9.01 [−20.15, 2.13]
Number of Reviews 0.01 [−0.00, 0.02] 7.22 [−1.91, 16.36]
R2 = .106, p = 0.189

Note. A significant b-weight indicates the beta-weight and semi-partial correlation are also significant. b represents unstandardized regression weights. beta indicates the standardized regression weights.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.