Table 2.
Type of Health Informatics Technology | Primary Role of Health Informatics in Communication | First Author | Study Type | Setting | Comments on Strategy |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
EHR – Direct Access | Direct CHW Communication with Providers | Allen et al, 201518 | Evaluation of CHW perspectives | CHWs recruited from American Public Health Association | CHWs used EHRs to communicate directly and indirectly with providers, make appointments, and track patients |
Valaitis et al29 | Scoping review | Patient navigator programs across US | Navigators used EHRs to share information with providers | ||
Documentation of CHW Encounters | Gunn et al, 201430 | Exploratory study | Patient navigation programs across US | Navigators used EMRs, charts, or other systems to document patient care | |
Gunn et al, 201731 | Mixed-methods analysis | Patient Navigation Research Program | Navigators documented/communicated patient progress with providers via EMR/IT systems | ||
Horny et al32 | Retrospective cohort study | Boston Medical Center | Navigators recorded information, including patient barriers, in detailed navigator template forms in EMRs | ||
Johnson et al21 | Perspective on CHWs | Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin | CHWs used EHRs to receive providers’ referrals and document patient progress | ||
Jolly et al33 | Description of program | Cleveland Clinic | Navigators used EHR templates to document/communicate patient data | ||
King et al34 | Evaluation of programs | Navajo clinics in Southwest US | CHWs documented patient encounters in EHR | ||
Ngo et al35 | Guide | Sinai Urban Health Institute | CHWs documented case notes in EHRs | ||
Ramachandran et al36 | Secondary analysis | Boston Patient Navigation Research Program | Navigators documented patient encounters, barriers to care, care plans, and progress in a template in EHR | ||
Reinschmidt et al13 | Evaluation of programs | Federally Qualified Health Centers in Arizona | CHWs documented patient encounters into EHRs (directly during visits or copy from paper | ||
Rohan et al37 | Randomized trial | Boston Medical Center | Navigators documented patient notes in medical records system form | ||
Spiro et al38 | Description of CHW model | Massachusetts General Hospital Chelsea Community Health | CHWs entered patient progress into EMRs | ||
Vora et al39 | Report on program | Charles B Wang Community Health Center | Navigators updated patient flow sheet in EMR; navigators reviewed patient history and patients’ barriers in EMR | ||
EHR – Indirect Access | Documentation of CHW Encounters | Wennerstrom et al40 | Description and evaluation of program | Patient Centered Medical Home in Louisiana | CHWs tracked patient information in electronic spreadsheets; medical office assistants attached spreadsheets to EHR |
Other | Lopez et al19 | Protocol for randomized controlled trial | Community clinics in New York City | EHR intervention (routine patient registry reports, medical alerts, culturally tailored order sets) combined with CHW program | |
Mobile Applications | Direct CHW Communication with Providers AND Documentation of CHW Encounters | Cherrington et al41 | Description of web application | Congregations for Public Health and Cooper Green Mercy Health System | CHWs used web based mobile application to document progress reports, track patients, and communicate with healthcare team |
Cloud Based Systems | Direct CHW Communication with Providers AND Documentation of CHW Encounters | Kangovi et al, 201442 Kangovi et al, 201743 |
Randomized clinical trial | University of Pennsylvania IMPaCT Model | CHWs utilized cloud based software that integrates with EHRs to track workflow, analyze patient progress, create reports, and can be used to message providers |
Web-Based Systems | Documentation of CHW Encounters | DeGroff et al44 | Randomized control trial | Boston Medical Center | Navigators documented participant barriers in navigator database |
Justvig et al45 | Prospective description | Stony Brook University Hospital | CHWs documented patient visits in Research Electronic Data Capture | ||
Kane et al46 Walton et al47 |
Analysis of CHW program outcomes | Baylor Health Care System/Baylor Scott and White Health community clinics | CHWs and providers utilized a HIPAA compliant web-based system to record patient progress and create reports that were added to patient’s medical records | ||
Percac-Lima et al48 | Randomized clinical trial | Massachusetts General Primary Care Practice Research Network | Navigators used IT application to track/contact patients and document interventions |