Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 26;7:23. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00305-2

Table 2.

Clinical outcomes of the two groups at implant placement

No ARP ARP
Bone quality Type 1 2 4
Type 2 108 163
Type 3 59 80
Type 4 2 0
Feasibility of implant placement Yes 163 245
No 8 2
Bone augmentation at implant surgery Horizontal bone augmentation Yes 66 45
No 105 202
Vertical bone augmentation Yes 26 3
No 145 244
Sinus floor elevation Yes 27 16
No 144 231
Total Yes 77 58
No 94 189
Implant Type Bone level, internal 144 172
Bone level, external 23 75
Tissue level 4 0
Length ≤ 8.5 mm 10 15
8.6–12.9 mm 157 230
≥ 13 mm 4 2
Diameter < 3.75 mm 3 18
3.75 to 4.5 mm 113 126
> 4.5 mm 55 103
System A 2 23
B 5 8
C 73 109
D 20 75
E 66 12
F 5 20
Surgical protocol 1-stage 121 155
2-stage 50 92
Periods (months) from extraction to implant placement Mean ± SD 4.98 ± 4.07 6.29 ± 3.50
< 3 months 50 0
3 to 6 months 121 124
> 6 months 0 123
Implant failure before loading 1 4

A: Astra (Dentsply Sirona, North Carolina, USA), B: ITI Dental Implant (Institut Straumann AG, Waldenburg, Switzerland), C: USII, and TSIII (Osstem implant, Seoul, Korea), D: Implantium and Superline (Dentium, Seoul, Korea) E: Luna, and Sola (Shinhung, Seoul, Korea) F: EB (Neobiotech, Seoul, Korea)