Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 13;11(3):e02002. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2002

TABLE 3.

Genotype and allele frequencies of polymorphisms

Genotype frequency (%) Allele frequency (%)
Locus Genotype AD (n = 98) Non‐AD (n = 109) p value Allele AD (n = 98) Non‐AD (n = 109) p value
rs701109 CC 50.00 42.20 .480 C 71.43 66.06 .240
CT 42.86 47.71 T 28.57 33.94
TT 7.14 10.09
Genotype AD (n = 97) Non‐AD (n = 109) p value Allele AD (n = 97) Non‐AD (n = 109) p value
rs989692 CC 54.64 52.29 .943 C 73.71 72.48 .778
CT 38.14 40.37 T 26.29 27.52
TT 7.22 7.34
Genotype AD (n = 97) Non‐AD (n = 109) p value Allele AD (n = 97) Non‐AD (N = 109) p value
rs9829757 CC 54.64 55.96 .964 C 73.20 74.31 .797
CT 37.11 36.69 T 26.80 25.69
TT 8.25 7.34
Genotype AD (n = 97) Non‐AD (n = 108) p value Allele AD (n = 97) Non‐AD (n = 108) p value
rs3736187 CC 0.00 1.85 .501 C 9.79 13.43 .284
TC 19.59 23.15 T 90.21 86.57
TT 80.41 75.00
Genotype AD (n = 97) Non‐AD (n = 109) p value Allele AD (n = 97) Non‐AD (n = 109) p value
rs1816558 GG 14.43 14.68 .844 G 40.21 38.53 .728
GA 51.55 47.71 A 59.79 61.47
AA 34.02 37.61
Genotype AD (n = 96) Non‐AD (n = 109) p value Allele AD (n = 96) Non‐AD (n = 109) p value
rs6776185 GG 2.08 0.00 1.000 G 11.46 9.63 .629
GA 18.75 19.27 A 88.54 90.37
AA 79.17 80.73

There was no significant difference in genotype frequency and allele frequency distribution of the 6 SNPs between AD group and control group in Tibetan population (p > .05).