Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 25;6:25. doi: 10.1038/s41525-021-00188-7

Table 5.

Diagnostic yield for aCGH and clinical exome sequencing and statistical comparison between both tests.

CGH array Clinical exome sequencing
Phenotype category and subcategory Solved
N (%)
Total
N
Solved
N (%)
Total
N
Adjusted p value (Mixed effects model)
GDD/ID (all) 64 (8.4%) 766 44 (26.2%)a 168 4.2 × 10−9
GDD/ID isol 38 (6.9%) 554 11 (16.2%)a 68 0.029
GDD/ID + epi 6 (16.7%) 36 4 (26.7%) 15 0.740
GDD/ID + micro/macro 3 (8.3%) 36 5 (55.6%)a 9 0.015
GDD/ID synd 17 (12.1%) 140 24 (31.5%)a 76 0.004
ASD (all) 13 (3.0%) 439 3 (6.1%) 49 0.498
ASD isol 11 (2.8%) 386 0 (–) 32 1
ASD + epi 0 (–) 12 1 (25.0%) 4 1
ASD + micro/macro 0 (–) 14 1 (25.0%) 4 1
ASD synd 2 (7.4%) 27 1 (11.1%) 9 1
Other NDDs (all) 3 (1.4%) 207 2 (7.1%) 28 0.177
Other isol 3 (1.8%) 171 2 (13.3%) 15 0.065
Other + epi 0 (–) 9 0 (–) 5 1
Other + micro/macro 0 (–) 8 0 (–) 2 1
Other synd 0 (–) 19 0 (–) 6 1
Total 80 (5.7%) 1412 49 (20%)a 245 7.0 × 10−12

For the phenotype: ASD Autism spectrum disorder, GDD/ID Global developmental delay/intellectual disability, Other NDDs other neurodevelopmental disorders, epi epilepsy, isol isolated forms, micro/macro micro/macrocephaly, synd syndromic, F female, M male.

aRefers to phenotypes where the diagnostic yield of clinical exome sequencing is statistically significant compared to aCGH.