Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 26.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Water Resour Assoc. 2019 Apr 5;55(2):354–368. doi: 10.1111/1752-1688.12689

Table 3.

Comparison of depression delineation results for Pipestem watershed using level-set method with different parameters

Parameters Run time (s) Number of depressions Median size (m2) Median volume (m3) Median depth (m)
Min size = 100 m2; interval = 0.2 m 281.0 54,849 2,034 266 0.25
Min size = 500 m2; interval = 0.2 m 270.0 43,606 2,628 395 0.30
Min size = 1,000 m2; interval = 0.2 m 253.4 39,897 2,835 448 0.31
Min size = 2,000 m2; interval = 0.2 m 225.5 24,564 5,409 1,062 0.37
Min size = 100 m2; interval = 0.4 m 175.2 42,813 2,367 347 0.29
Min size = 500 m2; interval = 0.4 m 167.9 38,490 2,646 414 0.31
Min size = 1,000 m2; interval = 0.4 m 167.1 36,800 2,754 439 0.32
Min size = 2,000 m2; interval = 0.4 m 163.0 22,672 5,220 1,041 0.37