Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 19;6(1):I–LXII. doi: 10.1177/2396987321989865

Table 5.

GRADE evidence profile for PICO 5.2.

Certainty assessment
No of patients
Effect
Certainty Importance
No of studies Study design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations IVT with tenecteplase IVT with alteplase Relative(95% CI) Absolute(95% CI)
mRS 0–1 at three months
3 randomised trials not serious seriousa seriousb not serious none 52/101(51.5%) 43/101(42.6%) OR 2.42(0.73–8.04) 216 more per 1 000(from 75 fewer to 431 more) ⨁⨁◯◯LOW CRITICAL
Improved mRS score at three months (shift analysis)
3 randomised trials not serious seriousa seriousb not serious none cOR 2.09(1.16–3.76) – per 1 000(from – to –) ⨁⨁◯◯LOW CRITICAL
Death at three months
1 randomised trials not serious not serious seriousc not serious none 10/101(9.9%) 18/101(17.8%) OR 0.4(0.2–1.1) 98 fewer per 1 000(from 137 fewer to 14 more) ⨁⨁⨁◯MODERATE CRITICAL
sICH
1 randomised trials not serious not serious not serious very seriousd none 1/101(1.0%) 1/101(1.0%) OR 1.0(0.1–16.2) – per 1 000(from – to 0 fewer) ⨁⨁◯◯LOW CRITICAL

The results regarding functional outcome are based on Bivard et al.55 (pooled analysis of the TAAIS50 and ATTEST48 trials) and the EXTEND IA TNK trial51 (Figure 7). The results about death and sICH are solely based on the EXTEND IA TNK trial.aIn EXTEND IA TNK, tenecteplase was only significantly associated with better functional outcome in shift analysis of the mRS. Furthermore, other RCTs in unselected patients did not suggest superiority of tenecteplase over alterplase.bThis result is based on a secondary outcome of the EXTEND IA TNK trial and subgroup analyses of TAAIS and ATTEST. In those last 2 trials, some patients had distal vessel occlusion (M2, M3, ACA, PCA).cThe primary endpoint was radiological, not clinical.dOnly one event in each treatment group.