Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 19;6(1):I–LXII. doi: 10.1177/2396987321989865

Table 8.

GRADE evidence profile for PICO 10.1 – Clinically severe stroke.

Certainty assessment
No of patients
Effect
Certainty Importance
No of studies Study design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations IVT with alteplase no IVT Relative(95% CI) Absolute(95% CI)
mRS 0–1 at three months
9 randomised trials seriousa not serious seriousb not serious strong association 22/309(7.1%) 8/313(2.6%) OR 3.25(1.42–7.47) 53 more per 1 000(from 10 more to 138 more) ⨁⨁⨁◯MODERATE CRITICAL
Fatal ICH with seven days
9 randomised trials seriousa not serious seriousb seriousc very strong association 21/309(6.8%) 2/313(0.6%) OR 10.94(2.54–47.15) 59 more per 1 000(from 10 more to 226 more) ⨁⨁⨁◯MODERATE CRITICAL

Note: All results are based on the individual participant data meta-analysis by Emberson et al.8aAlthough the 9 RCTs included in the individual patient data meta-analysis had patients with NIHSS ≥22, in many trials, patients with clinically very severe stroke (e.g. NIHSS >25 in ECASS-3) or radiologically severe stroke (e.g. attenuation of >1/3 of the MCA in ECASS 2 and ATLANTIS B) were excluded. Therefore, a selection bias is likely: patients with clinically severe stroke were not indiscriminately randomized in those trials.bThis result is based on an independent patient data meta-analysis of subgroups of 9 trials, and was restricted to patients with NIHSS ≥ 22. It is uncertain whether those results would also apply to patients with very severe stroke (e.g., NIHSS >25 or coma).cThe confidence interval is very wide