Table 4.
Responses of the participants on the acceptability of the BFP
| Item | Responses | Rural (N = 111) Frequency (%) | Urban (N = 186) Frequency (%) | 
|---|---|---|---|
| Preference of sanitary products | Both disposable pads and BFP | 38 (34.2) | 97 (52.2) | 
| BFP 80% of the time | – | 38 (20.4) | |
| Menstrual cup and BFP | – | 5 (2.7) | |
| Only BFP | 69 (62.2) | 42 (22.6) | |
| BFP and another brand of reusable pads | – | 2 (1.1) | |
| No response | 4 (3.6) | 2 (1.1) | |
| Recommending BFP to others | Very likely | 2 (14.3) | 104 (78.2) | 
| Likely | 9 (64.3) | 20 (15.0) | |
| Unlikely | 3 (21.4) | 2 (1.5) | |
| Very unlikely | – | 7 (5.3) | |
| Comfort and ease of use and reuse | Strongly agree | 104 (93.7) | 103 (55.4) | 
| Agree | 3 (2.7) | 53 (28.5) | |
| Neutral | – | 20 (10.8) | |
| Disagree | 4 (3.6) | 9 (4.8) | |
| Strongly disagree | – | 1 (0.5) | |
| Ease of washing and cleaning | Strongly agree | 106 (95.5) | 95 (51.1) | 
| Agree | 3 (2.7) | 61 (32.8) | |
| Neutral | – | 16 (8.6) | |
| Disagree | – | 4 (2.2) | |
| Strongly disagree | 2 (1.8) | 10 (5.4) | |
| Are others in the family now wantingto make switch to BFP? | Yes | 67 (60.4) | 85 (45.7) | 
| No | 29 (26.1) | 62 (33.3) | |
| Don’t know | 15 (13.5) | 39 (21.0) | |
| Like to continue to use the BFP? | Very likely | 98 (88.3) | 74 (74.0) | 
| Likely | 13 (11.7) | 19 (19.0) | |
| Unlikely | – | 2 (2.0) | |
| Very Unlikely | – | 5 (5.0) | |
| Reason for preferring BFP? | Easy to handle | 78 (70.3) | 62 (33.3) | 
| Absorbs better | 74 (66.7) | 63 (33.9) | |
| Feels clean | 10 (9.0) | 48 (25.8) | |
| Economical | 82 (73.9) | 120 (64.5) | |
| Eco-friendliness | 97 (87.4) | 165 (76.6) | |
| I feel traditional | 4 (3.6) | 25 (13.4) | |
| I feel modern | 8 (7.2) | 14 (7.5) | |
| Reason for recommending BFP? | Concern for the environment | 87 (78.0) | 120 (64.5) | 
| Concern for the health | 71 (63.6) | 34 (18.4) | |
| Money spent every month | 58 (52.3) | 31 (16.4) | |
| No response | 9 (8.3) | 1 (0.7) | 
Missing data a97; b53; c86