Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 11;28:39–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.03.001

Table 1.

Volumetric analysis of case 3–6 for a total of 30/40 completed delineation sets by 10 participants.

Reference volumes Participants volumes
mean Δ(part – ref) P-value*
Target volume mL N median mL (min–max) mL (%)
Case 3 GTVpre 39.4 9 38.6 (29.8–94.0) 3.8 (8.9)
GTVpost 8.9 9 12.9 (8.4–78.5) 16.2 (64.6)
CTV 71.8 10 82.8 (62.3–262.5) 42.4 (37.1) 0.20
Case 4 GTVpre 299.9 10 271.0 (227.9–295.1) −34.1 (−12.9)
GTVpost 59.8 10 41.5 (24.1–111.7) −12.5 (−26.5)
CTV 124.1 10 94.3 (56.4–231.2) −1.6 (−1.3) 0.72
Case 5 GTVpre 133.2 8 147.2 (123.9–162.0) 13.2 (9.0)
GTVpost 15.2 8 28.6 (12.0–54.1) 15.5 (50.5)
CTV 175.2 9 217.5 (149.9–409.7) 63.2 (26.5) 0.05
Case 6 GTVpre 164.7 9 163.3 (148.1–172.2) −4.3 (−2.7)
GTVpost 17.3 9 20.6 (10.6–42.1) 6.5 (27.6)
CTV 83.8 9 108.3 (49.2–193.7) 34.2 (29.0) 0.14

*For each case, the difference between the mean CTVobs and the CTVref was tested using a One-Sample Wilcoxon Signed Rank test. A p-value of < 0.05 was chosen to indicate statistical significance.